I still like the Charles R. Knight paintings but I think the real
revolution in prehistoric imagery started with Burian. Compared to
Knight, Burian's paintings are much more alive and believable. I
don't think there's anybody (up until now) that has painted
prehistoric mammal scenes better than him... Knight is too static
(sometimes too 'pretty-posed' also) and Burian is all dynamism.
I do have my reservations regarding the majority of Burian's
dinosaurs though. I think there's a definitive contrast between
the liveness and realism of the other animals he depicts (specially
all mammals including prehistoric men) and the (sometimes)
caricaturesque quality of his dinosaurs... they are definitively
>less< believable as real, living animals. Burian shows that there
was still a real problem in interpreting the dinosaurs and their
anatomy in those times.
But of course, the landscaping is still fabulous.
On 26 Aug 2006, at 19:56, Danvarner@aol.com wrote:
I believe the photos are frames from a film, which would be a
wonderful
thing to see, especially scenes of him actually painting. Knight
is my favorite,
of course, but Burian worked with a magic brush. He was fast and
full of
tricks. Just look at his trees and foliage. He's the one I'd like
most to watch
over his shoulder. DV
Luis Rey
Visit my website
http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~luisrey