[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: BAD vs. BADD (was: Re: Most popular/common dinosaur misconceptions)
Scott Hartman wrote:
The fact that on this very list it was claimed that inner ear bones (which
are likely homoplastic anyways) and fur makes whales, bats, and pyrotheres
all mammals, while running with slightly less femoral excursion makes
extant birds different from theropods, shows how badly misleading the
system is.
As a gauge of disparity, the Linnean system is an absolute disaster.
Well said, Scott. The Linnaean system is an absolute disaster in terms of
both disparity AND diversity.
This is taxonomy's 'dirty little secret': ranks are, and have always been,
utterly subjective. There is absolutely no biological principal behind a
"Class" or an "Order", except that these ranks were convenient and gave the
illusion of stability. But both premises were based on a lack of knowledge,
especially concerning evolution and the fossil record. After all, Linnaeus
was a creationist (though, to be fair, he lived at a time when there was no
known alternatives to Genesis), and his method of classification had more in
common with stamp collecting than evolutionary biology. I know this sounds
horribly elitist, and I have the utmost respect for Linnaeaus. But it's
time to move on.
On a tangential note... the IAU has decided on new criteria to define a
'planet'. Pluto has been cut, and there are now only eight planets in our
solar system. (I don't think I could ever get my mind around Pluto and
Charon being 'twin planets'.) Jeff's predictions were true - well done!
Cheers
Tim