Re: The really BIG dinosaur misconception

[Jamie Stearns <stearns5@cox.net>]

> I've been catching up on the DML info, and there is a MAJOR dinosaur 
> misconception that hasn't been touched. This is one that is
> held not only by the general public, but also non-paleontologists 
> scientists, TV producers, etc.:
>
> * Many Mesozoic dinosaur species are known from statistcially-signficant 
> numbers, with complete skeletons of both identifiable
> sexes, growth series, and eggs (including embryos).
> (And most especially the famous species!!)

Just out of curiosity, is there any dinosaur known from a totally complete 
skeleton?