[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: New paper on Neoaves

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: New paper on Neoaves
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:37:16 +0200
References: <BAY113-F429BCF60458A3C54A2494AC4B0@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

I suppose I don't get what you're worrying about.  If we have extremely
well (>95%) supported nodes, then we know things are working.

That said, some people suspect that Bayesian posterior probabilities are generally too high...

References:
- RE: New paper on Neoaves
  - From: Michael Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>

Prev by Date: RE: New paper on Neoaves
Next by Date: Re: New paper on Neoaves
Previous by thread: RE: New paper on Neoaves
Next by thread: RE: New paper on Neoaves
Indexes: