[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Tiktaalik
David Marjanovic wrote:
I don't think so. The toothplates and jaws of lungfish are quite
awe-inspiring. (For example lungfish don't have an upper jaw -- just a
palate.) The cocoon is almost unique among vertebrates as well.
I'm talking body plans. So was Daeschler et al. (2006) in their _Nature_
paper. The term "body plan" is even in the title. No matter how
awe-inspiring a lungfish's cakehole is, it's not going to help it move
around on land. Of course, no offense to lungfishes is intended...
Sorry, I can't help it -- this all sounds so much like an argument for
ranks :^)
Oh no! Not those horrible "ranks"! I'm not talking typology here (heaven
forfend!), but transformations involving locomotion in (or on) two different
kinds of media. Tetrapods (including ourselves) are still just uppity
lobe-finned fish, and birds will always be theropods. But both transitions
involved major transformations, associated with water-to-land and
land-to-air. (The latter is still true even if birds evolved from arboreal
theropods, because no known non-avian theropod is specialized for
arboreality; they retain the terrestrial-bipedal body plan primitive for
Theropoda.)
Not convinced? Ask yourself this: Why did _Nature_ magazine dedicate a
combined 18 pages to the discovery of _Tiktaalik_? It made the cover too.
It was not just because this critter was "photogenic" (though it was that
too).
Cheers
Tim