[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dino reputation 'is exaggerated'

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Dino reputation 'is exaggerated'
From: Michael Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:14:34 +0000
In-reply-to: <1f4a892d0510311239kf88980ekcb7aa845a25b599e@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: mickey_mortimer111@msn.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

T. Michael Keesey wrote-

And what sauropods lived alongside _Velociraptor_, anyway?

Sauropods are actually known from just about every formation Velociraptor has been reported in. They're not named, and most probably aren't described, as I bet the remains are fragmentary. Presumably they were titanosaurs, as this was post-Cenomanian.

Mickey Mortimer

References:
- Re: Dino reputation 'is exaggerated'
  - From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Fwd: Eric Snively on sickle-claws
Next by Date: Re: Sickles and Ken Carpenter's paper
Previous by thread: Re: Dino reputation 'is exaggerated'
Next by thread: Re: Dino reputation 'is exaggerated'
Indexes: