[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Archaeopteryx with bird book, was Re: Archaeopteryx flight

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Archaeopteryx with bird book, was Re: Archaeopteryx flight
From: Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:07:45 -0500
In-reply-to: <20051023220508.rgddwwxj4ww04wcs@web.mail.umich.edu>
Reply-to: twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Nick Pharris wrote:

The skull is not known for the carnosaurs _Lourinhanosaurus_ and _Poekilopleuron,
...unless _P.? valesdunensis_ is correctly referred, that is.


It isn't.

;-)

Cheers

Tim

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Archaeopteryx with bird book, was Re: Archaeopteryx flight
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>

References:
- Re: Archaeopteryx with bird book, was Re: Archaeopteryx flight
  - From: Nick Pharris <npharris@umich.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Archaeopteryx with bird book, was Re: Archaeopteryx flight
Next by Date: New Kong book
Previous by thread: Re: Archaeopteryx with bird book, was Re: Archaeopteryx flight
Next by thread: RE: Archaeopteryx with bird book, was Re: Archaeopteryx flight
Indexes: