[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Gastornis vs. Diatryma

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Gastornis vs. Diatryma
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 19:32:37 +0100 (MET)
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58L0.0511222245570.16950@zipcon.net>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Ian Paulsen <birdbooker@zipcon.net>
> Datum: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:48:03 -0800 (PST)
>
> HI:
>  I was wondering which genus is currently correct/used for the taxa?

The two names are today considered synonymous, and because *Gastornis* is 
older, it wins.

-- 
Highspeed-Freiheit. Bei GMX supergünstig, z.B. GMX DSL_Cityflat,
DSL-Flatrate für nur 4,99 Euro/Monat*  http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gastornis vs. Diatryma
  - From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>

References:
- Gastornis vs. Diatryma
  - From: Ian Paulsen <birdbooker@zipcon.net>

Prev by Date: RE: Genealogy of Scaly Reptiles Rewritten by New Research
Next by Date: Re: Genealogy of Scaly Reptiles Rewritten by New Research
Previous by thread: Gastornis vs. Diatryma
Next by thread: Re: Gastornis vs. Diatryma
Indexes: