[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: K/T revisited, was: Re: DINOSAUR digest 3382

To: jorgedich@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: K/T revisited, was: Re: DINOSAUR digest 3382
From: Roberto Takata <rmtakata@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:06:58 -0200
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <20051110121550.69422.qmail@web52215.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <200511090804.jA984EP11403@listproc.usc.edu> <20051110121550.69422.qmail@web52215.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: rmtakata@gmail.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

2005/11/10, Jorge Dichenberg <jorgedich@yahoo.com>:
> Isn't KT extinction easy? Perfectly selective for
> feeding preferences. Everything which eats dead plants
> (detritus) survived. Everything else died out.

What about that survive/extinction pattern if we look at the marine
biota? Sharks survived, marine reptiles don't. Ammonites go extinct,
squids don't.

[]s,

Roberto Takata

References:
- K/T revisited, was: Re: DINOSAUR digest 3382
  - From: Jorge Dichenberg <jorgedich@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Evidence of Huge Ancient Crocodile Found
Next by Date: Re: Evidence of Huge Ancient Crocodile Found
Previous by thread: Re: K/T revisited, was: Re: DINOSAUR digest 3382
Next by thread: Re: K/T revisited, was: Re: DINOSAUR digest 3382
Indexes: