[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: New papers on the dinosaur formerly known as Syntarsus (no more "Megapnosaurus")
From: "Jaime A. Headden" <qilongia@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: qilongia@yahoo.com
To: dinosaur@usc.edu
CC: archosauromorph2@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: New papers on the dinosaur formerly known as Syntarsus (no
more "Megapnosaurus")
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Which reminds me. The initial description of *Syntarsus kayentakatae*
used
the nature of the nasolachrymoprefrontal fontanelle (or nasal fenestra) as
the
diagnostic feature linking *kayentakatae* to *rhodesiensis*, thus
validating
the species's assignment into *Syntarsus*. If this feature is an artefact
in
*rhodesiensis*, then what is the condition in *kayentakatae*? It is likely,
with regards to the shorter snout and crests, that *kayentakatae*
represents a
taxon other than *Coelophysis* or *Syntarsus* and thankfully, the name
*Megapnosaurus* cannot be applied to it without *rhodesiensis*.
Cheers,
Jaime A. Headden
Last night I did a bit more reading on ?*C. kayentakatae*, and it does seem
to have several other *Dilophosaurus*-like characteristics independent of
the crests. So despite every published cladogram linking it with *C.
rhodesiensis* and far from *Dilophosaurus*, I think it's possible that
someone could make a good case for it not being *Coelophysis*.