Peter Buchholz wrote:
(Nice to hear from you, Pete!)
If I recall correctly (all literature is in boxes at the moment, so bear with me), _Technosaurus_ was based entirely on skull elements, some of which may be prosauropod, and some of which apear to be (to me anyway) actually ornithischian.
David Peters wrote:
This is the kind of material that needs to be looked at with the eye that MAYBE the pubis is not retroverted in this taxon, (Is that why it appears to be mixed up with sauropodomorph material? I don't know and haven't seen).
Cheers
Tim