[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Ichthyosaurus fossilised in mid-birth ??

To: dannj@alphalink.com.au
Subject: Re: Ichthyosaurus fossilised in mid-birth ??
From: Roberto Takata <rmtakata@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:51:50 -0300
Cc: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <42E2C2B2.DC7CA1BD@alphalink.com.au>
References: <20050723210750.85735.qmail@web25403.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <42E2C2B2.DC7CA1BD@alphalink.com.au>
Reply-to: Roberto Takata <rmtakata@gmail.com>
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

2005/7/23, Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>:
> Perhaps we should rename them Romeosaurus and Julietceratops? :)

And that explain the extinction of dinosaurs: they engaged in a
unfertile interspecific affairs...

Bigelow: Pterosaus not archosaurs?

[]s,

Roberto Takata

References:
- RE: Ichthyosaurus fossilised in mid-birth ??
  - From: Aidan Karley <aidan_karley@yahoo.co.uk>
- Re: Ichthyosaurus fossilised in mid-birth ??
  - From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: JVP 25(2): New Dinos, Birds, Discoveries
Next by Date: Baby sauropod footprints
Previous by thread: jvp 2005-25-2 pdfs just up online
Next by thread: RE: Ichthyosaurus fossilised in mid-birth ??
Indexes: