[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: taxonomy is not stratigraphy (was Re: JVP 25(2): New Dinos, Birds, Discoveri

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: taxonomy is not stratigraphy (was Re: JVP 25(2): New Dinos, Birds, Discoveri
From: Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 22:46:03 -0500
In-reply-to: <BAY106-F34FB5C6BFB65F1455CD29198D30@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Brad McFeeters wrote:

There are a few coelophysoids in the 20-foot range. *Gojirasaurus quayi*, *Dilophosaurus wetherilli*...


_Aliwalia_ was pretty big too.  It might have been a herrerasaurian.

Cheers

Tim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: taxonomy is not stratigraphy (was Re: JVP 25(2): New Dinos, Birds, Discoveri
  - From: Michael Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>

References:
- Re: taxonomy is not stratigraphy (was Re: JVP 25(2): New Dinos, Birds, Discoveri
  - From: Brad McFeeters <archosauromorph2@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: taxonomy is not stratigraphy (was Re: JVP 25(2): New Dinos, Birds, Discoveri
Next by Date: Re: taxonomy is not stratigraphy (was Re: JVP 25(2): New Dinos, Birds, Discoveri
Previous by thread: Re: taxonomy is not stratigraphy (was Re: JVP 25(2): New Dinos, Birds, Discoveri
Next by thread: Re: taxonomy is not stratigraphy (was Re: JVP 25(2): New Dinos, Birds, Discoveri
Indexes: