[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: About abelisaurs
Just some of my random speculations:
Slender, "weakly built" jaws might not necessairly
mean they were not used to attack. Big strong jaws
would be necessary if a predator wanted to grab its
prey in its mouth and not let go (i.e. crocodiles,
maybe _T. rex_). Slender jaws would be fine if the
predator was only rushing it and biting off pieces of
flesh without "latching on" to its prey. To use your
own comparison--like a pirrannah. A pirrannah rushes
in and removes a mouthfull of flesh. A Carnotaurus
might have rushed in and bit off a chunk of
meat,repeated if necessary, then waited for the victim
to die from blood loss and shock (a school of
pirrannah-like carnotauri?).
Jumping would be an option, but I'd want to
investigate the hindlimbs and spine in more depth to
see if they could have generated the power necessary
and/or be able to withstand the stress of such a
pounce (in any case, jumping to attack the neck or
flank of a fully-grown sauropod seems awfly risky--and
predators tend to prefer an easy meal)
Maybe they were scavengers... ;)
We should probably establish that any hunting or
feeding strategy for carnotaurus may not necessairly
be indicative of abelisaurs as a whole. Just a wild
guess here, but wouldn't carnotaurus's puny arms be a
more "derived' characteristic?
Eric Allen
Undergraduate, TTU
--- Amtoine Grant <ajgrant@eastlink.ca> wrote:
> As I'm trying to figure out the likely methods of
> attack various
> lineages of theropods may have used, I find myself
> contemplating on the
> the abelisaurs. I've read that the lower jaw of at
> least Carnotaurus
> seems 'weakly' built with more slender than usual
> teeth. To me, it
> would seem that the jaws may not have been the best
> method of attack.
> But the arms are atrophied as if attempting to make
> a two-legged snake.
> .
> Which brings me to the feet. Noting the strange
> structure of the
> foremost caudal vertebra, perhaps this may have been
> an adaptation to
> balancing on the tail while striking with the toe
> claws. . Are toe
> claws known for abelisaurs?
> I was originally thinking that they may have been
> leapers, leaping and
> ripping at the fleshy necks of sauropods, a feat for
> which they would
> not have needed particularly strong jaws. Perhaps
> the 'wing'-shaped
> dorsal vertebrae were an adaptation for withstanding
> the stress to the
> backbone when landing from these leaps. .
> Also, I've noticed that the cranial morphology of
> abelisaurs(Carnotaurus at least), compared to all
> other predators in
> the animal kingdom, most closely resembles
> piranhas[albeit
> superficially]. .
> Thoughts?
>
> BTW, watching the Alpha's Egg episode of Dinosaur
> Planet, did anyone
> else notice that they had Carcharodontosaurs
> attacking the sauropods in
> South America? Last I checked, Carcharodontosaurus
> is from Africa,
> Giganotosaurus is from South America. LOL
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail