[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: More questions on the Burma microplate (allegedly where the quake occurred)

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: More questions on the Burma microplate (allegedly where the quake occurred)
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 21:40:15 +0100
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10412271651510.10908-100000@asuwlink.uwyo.edu> <019d01c4edb4$453e6630$0300a8c0@IPC>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqinthenews/2004/usslav/


Wow!

Interesting that the "Burma" plate just touches Burma, let alone the Malacca peninsula or strait. Why wasn't it called, say, "Andaman plate"?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More questions on the Burma microplate (allegedly where the quake occurred)
  - From: Gautam Majumdar <gmajumdar@freeuk.com>
- Re: More questions on the Burma microplate (allegedly where the quake occurred)
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: More questions on the Burma microplate (allegedly where the quake occurred)
Next by Date: Re: Most important paper for 2004?
Previous by thread: Re: More questions on the Burma microplate (allegedly where the quake occurred)
Next by thread: Re: More questions on the Burma microplate (allegedly where the quake occurred)
Indexes: