[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: altricial nestlings, PS

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: altricial nestlings, PS
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:34:16 +0200
References: <20041014004327.54409.qmail@web14208.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jaime A. Headden" <qilongia@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 2:43 AM

> *Procheneosaurus* and *Cheneosaurus* are, for the
> most part, not considered obsolete collections of polyphyletic non-adult
> specimens of *Corythosaurus,* *Lambeosaurus,* and *Hypacrosaurus.*

I assume "not" is a typo for "now"? Just to make sure (this turns the
sentence into its opposite).

References:
- re: altricial nestlings, PS
  - From: "Jaime A. Headden" <qilongia@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: altricial nestling bone fossilization
Next by Date: Re: The Holy of Holies... Dinosauria II
Previous by thread: re: altricial nestlings, PS
Next by thread: Mei
Indexes: