[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Diplodocoidea vs. Diplodocimorpha

To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Diplodocoidea vs. Diplodocimorpha
From: "Mickey Mortimer" <Mickey_Mortimer111@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 15:31:37 -0700
References: <200405111559.i4BFx2oj030602@localhost.localdomain> <BAY11-DAV89kScfpVhY000039b0@hotmail.com> <200405112108.i4BL8uM3000707@localhost.localdomain> <BAY11-DAV1001CmBQBg00003a68@hotmail.com> <200405112225.i4BMPU5S001001@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-to: Mickey_Mortimer111@msn.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Mike Taylor wrote-

> You've got me really interested now!  I have both Wilson 2002 and
> Upchurch 1995 in front of me now, and re-skimming the former doesn't
> turn up a mention of "Diplodocoidea Upchurch 1995".  What page is it
> on?

Page 265-
"For example, Marsh (1884) is credited with naming the Superfamily
Diplodocoidea because he coined Diplodocidae, but the superfamily was first
applied more than a century later by Upchurch (1995)."
Page 269-
"Diplodocoidea (Marsh, 1884; Upchurch, 1995)"

Mickey Mortimer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Diplodocoidea vs. Diplodocimorpha
  - From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>

References:
- Diplodocoidea vs. Diplodocimorpha
  - From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
- Re: Diplodocoidea vs. Diplodocimorpha
  - From: "Mickey Mortimer" <Mickey_Mortimer111@msn.com>
- Re: Diplodocoidea vs. Diplodocimorpha
  - From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
- Re: Diplodocoidea vs. Diplodocimorpha
  - From: "Mickey Mortimer" <Mickey_Mortimer111@msn.com>
- Re: Diplodocoidea vs. Diplodocimorpha
  - From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Diplodocoidea vs. Diplodocimorpha
Next by Date: Re: Diplodocoidea vs. Diplodocimorpha
Previous by thread: Re: Diplodocoidea vs. Diplodocimorpha
Next by thread: Re: Diplodocoidea vs. Diplodocimorpha
Indexes: