[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: "Common ancestor" in cladistics
Quoting "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>:
> A real case of this is _Branta canadensis_ (Canadian geese), which have had
> multiple insular isolate populations which have diverged from the ancestral
> form (some of the Hawaiian forms being the most interesting and most
> divergent), even while the good old-fashioned ones are doing just fine.
Indeed, the species hitherto recognized as the Canada Goose turns out to be
based on plesiomorphic plumage patterns (gray-brown body, black neck and head,
white chin patch). The large-bodied forms are actually related to a Hawaiian
radiation containing at least three species (including the nene, _B.
sandvicensis_), whereas the small-bodied "Canada" Goose is closer to the
Barnacle Goose, _B. leucopsis_.
The American Ornithologists' Union has accordingly just recognized the
small-bodied form as a separate species, the Cackling Goose (_Branta
hutchinsii_). Further splits may be in the offing.
References:
Banks, R.C., C. Cicero, J.L. Dunn, A.W. Kratter, P.C. Rasmussen, J.V. Remsen,
Jr., J.D. Rising, and D.F. Stotz. 2004. Forty-fifth supplement to the
American Ornithologists' Union _Check-list of North American birds_. The Auk
121:985-995.
Paxinos, E.E., H.F. James, S.L. Olson, M. Sorenson, J. Jackson, and R.C.
Fleischer. 2002. MtDNA from fossils reveals a radiation of Hawaiian geese
recently derived from the Canada Goose (_Branta canadensis_). Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences USA 99:1399-1404.
Nick Pharris
Department of Linguistics
University of Michigan