RE: Saurischian pages finished

[Jordan Mallon <j_mallon@hotmail.com>]

> From: Steven Mahon <floridamahon@yahoo.com>

> --- Brad McFeeters <archosauromorph2@hotmail.com> > -
> Is there any good reason for regarding
> > *Arctosaurus* as a possible
> > saurischian?
>
> I used Justin Tweet's wonderful Thescelosaurus! that
> gave me info on that critter.
> He has it in Dinosauria i.s. but notes that it has
> been considered a theropod & a prosauropod. So I
> concluded to put where the two branches met-
> Saurischia! See here-
> http://personal2.stthomas.edu/jstweet/dinosauromorpha.htm

HP Tweet also lists it as having been considered a turtle.  So why not just 
kick it all the out back to Reptilia? ;)
Ideally, such vague references ought to be cited, so as not to spread 
confusion amongst the oft-confused Internet dinosaur community.  Though I 
still get a kick out of how many people believed my obviously false 
"Reelybigosaurus" story (now removed from my website) years ago.
Oy ve,

Jordan Mallon

Undergraduate Student, Carleton University
Vertebrate Paleontology & Paleoecology

Paleoart website: http://www.geocities.com/paleoportfolio/
http://dino.lm.com/artists/display.php?name=Mallon
MSN Messenger: j_mallon@hotmail.com

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Premium with Virus Guard and Firewall* from McAfee® Security : 2 months 
FREE*   
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines