Re: Labrosaurus (was RE: birds and dinosaurs)

[Phil Bigelow <bigelowp@juno.com>]

Does that mean that a neotype is also a referred specimen?

<pb>
--

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 10:41:58 -0600 Ken Carpenter <KCarpenter@dmns.org>
writes:
> Mickey is correct, however, that the paratype must be designated in 
> the same publication as the holotype . Any specimen mentioned 
> afterwards (even in a redescription of the holotype) are referred 
> specimens.
> Ken
> 
> Kenneth Carpenter, Ph.D.
> Curator of Lower Vertebrate Paleontology &
> Chief Preparator
> Dept. of Earth Sciences
> Denver Museum of Natural History 
> 2001 Colorado Blvd.
> Denver, CO 80205
> 
> Phone: (303)370-6392
> Fax: (303)331-6492
> email: KCarpenter@DMNS.org
> 
> For fun:
>  http://dino.lm.com/artists/display.php?name=Kcarpenter
> 
> 
> >>> "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu> 07/Jul/04 >>>
> > From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]On 
> Behalf Of
> > Tim Williams
> >Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
> >Actually, the "paratype" (technically a topotype, as Chure points 
> out) and
> >the (unnecessary) neotype were officially indicated in Madsen 
> (1976, p. 10).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!