[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: extinction5

To: <cbennett@bridgeport.edu>, "Dinosaur Listserver" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: extinction5
From: "Christopher Collinson" <Chris_Collinson@monarch.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 13:18:48 -0800
References: <395651F7.1656AD4C.34AF6DEF@aol.com> <001401c3e37c$40d42280$6501a8c0@hamden01.ct.comcast.net>
Reply-to: Chris_Collinson@monarch.net
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Bennett" <cbennett@bridgeport.edu>
To: "Dinosaur Listserver" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: extinction5

> Close relatives?   There is a lot of talk about pterosaurs on the dinosaur
> list and a considerable proportion of pterosaur workers now doubt that
> pterosaurs are closely related to dinosaurs.
>

Does this mean the prolacertiform hypothesis is gaining some ground?

Cheers,
Christopher

References:
- Re : extinction5
  - From: Aegyptiacus@aol.com
- Re: extinction5
  - From: "Chris Bennett" <cbennett@bridgeport.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Long, long last gasp. (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: Re : extinction5
Previous by thread: Re: extinction5
Next by thread: Re: Re : extinction5
Indexes: