[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: extinction
Response to David Marjanovic's Wed, 07 Jan 2004 21:12:47 post.
Dear David, I'm thoroughly enjoying our exchanges on the K-T
extinctions (which, for the purposes of this list, included the
dinosaurs). I thank, and compliment, you for being both a congenial
and well-read debate partner.
Your post references James Powell's book, _Night Comes to the
Cretaceous: Dinosaur Extinction and the Transformation of Modern
Geology_ (1998). I imagine that many, if not most, others on this
list have also read that book. Those who have read Powell's book can
only have a false impression of my K-T extinctions research. It is
necessary for me to correct that impression in order that my posts be
understood in their proper context.
Powell (p. 94) states that I am an "anti-impactor." That I am _not_
an anti-impactor is made clear by a quotation from my 1991 paper
titled "Impact Winter in the Global K-T Extinctions: No Definitive
Evidences," (in Levine, J. S., ed., _Global Biomass Burning:
Atmospheric, Climatic, and Biospheric Implications_, Cambridge, MIT
Press, p. 493-503). Here is the quotation:
"A combination [impact and Deccan Traps volcanism] model would have a
short-duration K-T boundary impact-induced greenhouse superimposed
upon, and intensifying, a long-duration volcano-induced K-T
transition greenhouse. Such unification would accommodate the K-T
boundary shocked minerals, and intensification of ecological
stresses, within the long-duration K-T transition carbon cycle and
bioevolutionary perturbations that are preserved in the record. This
unification, which accords with the actual record, offers a step
forward in isolating the cause of the extinctions while other details
are being sorted out down through the years. Theory coupling
greenhouse warming to embryogenesis dysfuntion in global extinctions
has been developed (McLean, 1988). In fact, some impactors have
advocated greenhouse conditions as a K-T killing mechanism in their
models (Emiliani et al., 1981; O'Keefe and Ahrens, 1988, 1989; Hsu et
al., 1982)."
I note for the record that my paper was published seven years prior
to publication of the Powell book.
Cordially,
Dewey McLean