[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Comet Hit Suspected For 536 AD

To: dannj@alphalink.com.au, dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Comet Hit Suspected For 536 AD
From: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:32:43 -0800
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10402061310510.21255-100000@asuwlink.uwyo.edu> <402408F2.3E150A4C@alphalink.com.au>
Reply-to: jrccea@bellsouth.net
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Wasn't Krakatoa about 1350 years too late? 


Dann Pigdon wrote:
> 
> > some 1,500 years ago - a comet colliding with Earth.
> 
> What happened to the Krakatoa theory?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comet Hit Suspected For 536 AD
  - From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>

References:
- Comet Hit Suspected For 536 AD
  - From: "Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu>
- Re: Comet Hit Suspected For 536 AD
  - From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>

Prev by Date: DINOSAURNEWS - Paleo-Fest at the Burpee * Dino 'Survival' Disputed * Much Ado About Sue * First Antarctic Dinosaur Fossils * Final Week In Patagonia Keeps Crew Busy
Next by Date: Re: Comet Hit Suspected For 536 AD
Previous by thread: Re: Comet Hit Suspected For 536 AD
Next by thread: Re: Comet Hit Suspected For 536 AD
Indexes: