[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Combined answer 1: cladistics
In a message dated 2/1/04 6:51:18 AM Eastern Standard Time,
david.marjanovic@gmx.at writes:
<< No; are the known phylogenies those of viruses? >>
In the second case, yes (Bacteriophage T7). Atchley & Fitch used inbred
strains of Mus musculus.
<<Seems too good to be true. Neighbor-joining is phenetics. I must confess I
don't know Fitch-Margoliash, Cavalli-Sforza or unweighted pair-group... the
latter sounds phenetic :-) ... do you have the complete refs?>>
Yuppers.
Atchely, W.R. & Fitch, W.M. 1991. Gene trees and the origins of inbred
strains of mice. Science 254: 554-558.
Hillis, D.M. et al. 1992. Experimental phylogenetics: generation of a known
phylogeny. Science 255: 589-592.
It's unfortunate, though, that neither of these use morphologic character
data, but I suppose thats inevitable.
-Sean