[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Wellnhoferia grandis valid?

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Wellnhoferia grandis valid?
From: Mark Van Tomme <markvantomme@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 02:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-to: markvantomme@yahoo.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Just wondering if the 6th specimen of Archaeopteryx
(Solnhofen) can be assigned to a different genus,in
the case, Wellnhoferia grandis Elzanowski, 2001.
Elzanowski argued that differences in the manus,pes
and tail were enough to separate the 6th specimen from
the others,and he excluded the possibility of
individual differentiation.


Best

Mark


        
                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wellnhoferia grandis valid?
  - From: "K and T Dykes" <ktdykes@arcor.de>

Prev by Date: Get a Diploma without the hassle!.. transfuse automorphic fraught thomistic y bicameral ceremony dimple buffalo audubon lopseed affricate stare electronic charlemagne israeli accipiter hoar steele bream decry agouti rata correspond integument repelling kirkland shotgun able subterranean hasty
Next by Date: Re: Wellnhoferia grandis valid?
Previous by thread: Get a Diploma without the hassle!.. transfuse automorphic fraught thomistic y bicameral ceremony dimple buffalo audubon lopseed affricate stare electronic charlemagne israeli accipiter hoar steele bream decry agouti rata correspond integument repelling kirkland shotgun able subterranean hasty
Next by thread: Re: Wellnhoferia grandis valid?
Indexes: