[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Stem-modified node shorthand?

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Stem-modified node shorthand?
From: SeanSt8579@aol.com
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:00:06 EDT
Reply-to: SeanSt8579@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

In a message dated 4/14/04 12:49:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
mightyodinn@yahoo.com writes:

<< I would say that simply saying "extant" implies a list, and a list would 
imply
 a node-based definition. So, "Clade(extant Clade(_Passer domesticus_ <- 
_Gallus
 gallus_, _Anser anser_)" could translate to "the clade stemming from the last
 common ancestor of all extant members of the clade stemming from the first
 ancestor of _Passer domesticus_ which is not also ancestral to _Gallus 
gallus_
 or _Anser anser_". >>

Ahhh...yes. Gotcha.

Prev by Date: Re: Stem-modified node shorthand?
Next by Date: Get a Diploma without the hassle!.. demijohn bade concrete salad assiduity bellhop discrepant despotic beet bronchiole seaquake blowup buchenwald himself electret chinaman caliph pigeonberry suey triumphant regrettable christina
Previous by thread: Re: Stem-modified node shorthand?
Next by thread: Get a Diploma without the hassle!.. demijohn bade concrete salad assiduity bellhop discrepant despotic beet bronchiole seaquake blowup buchenwald himself electret chinaman caliph pigeonberry suey triumphant regrettable christina
Indexes: