[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Cretaceous taeniodont

To: Nick Pharris <npharris@umich.edu>
Subject: Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
From: John Bois <jbois@umd5.umd.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:42:15 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <1081794598.407ae026453ad@mail.umich.edu>
References: <20040409.154817.-951241.0.bigelowp@juno.com> <Pine.OSF.4.51.0404100858320.10167@marlowe.umd.edu> <1081720337.4079be1154e79@mail.umich.edu>
Reply-to: jbois@umd5.umd.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Nick Pharris wrote:
> I was
> just refuting your contention about small, quadrupedal dinosaurs.  I'd also
> like to add small ankylosaurs like *Minmi*, and possibly *Scutellosaurus* as
> well.

Is it not true that the smallest dinosaurs were bipedal?  And weren't your
above-mentioned dinosaurs considerably above the size of most mammalian
burrowers?  I think this was my contention.

References:
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: Phil Bigelow <bigelowp@juno.com>
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: John Bois <jbois@umd5.umd.edu>
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: Nick Pharris <npharris@umich.edu>
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: Nick Pharris <npharris@umich.edu>

Prev by Date: Museum Fails to Smell a Rat * Original Home to Animal Life * Dust-up among the Dinosaurs * Computer to "Morph" Deformed Fossils * Dino's-Eye view of Asteroid
Next by Date: Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
Previous by thread: Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
Next by thread: Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
Indexes: