[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Further Thoughts on the Origin of Chelonia



Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. wrote:

Incidentally, I think that (much as I would like turtles to be surviving
pareiasaurs) they are going to prove to be archosauromorphs. The molecules
really do seem to point that way, particularly as the taxon sampling has
increased (so it isn't just one croc, one bird, one squamate, and one
turtle).

This is not in contradiction to Tom - after all, I also happen to believe that our shelled friends (including my pet turtle) are secondarily anapsid, and probably some sort of diapsid. However, improved taxon sampling does not always improve the resolution of a given phylogeny. Molecules have quirks and idiosyncracies, just as morphological characters do - DNA just happens to have different sorts of quirks and idiosyncracies. Expanding the number of taxa, and/or expanding the number of genes or sequences, does not automatically 'smooth over' the bumps in a molecular-based phylogeny.


The usefulness of a gene in capturing deep divergences (as we have with turtles vs other amniotes) relies on the gene having evolved slowly enough so as not to become saturated with substitutions, but not too slowly that too few substitutions accumulate over time (such as if the encoded protein is functionally constrained from evolving too much). Expanding the taxon sample does not in of itself overcome this problem. Also, even within a given clade, the same genes from different species can have their own intrinsic biases (e.g., codon usage, GC content), which can further mess things up, since these biases can be mistaken for synapomorphies. Thus, unrelated critters can be pulled together on account of these biases.

I'm not saying that the phylogeny or phylogenies that Tom is referring to are incorrect. But, theoretically (and this is a very hard thing to do), if one could remove the "noise" that is disrupting the evolutionary signal, then a smaller number of taxa would suffice to produce an accurate phylogeny.



Tim



Tim

_________________________________________________________________
Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com