[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dinosauricon Phylogeny: in progress
> But before that, in 2001 (Ostrom Symposium volume) he defined it as "the
> common ancestor of Patagopteryx, Vorona and Ornithurae, and all
> descendents from this ancestor."
Ah yeah, figure caption on page 126: "Ornithuromorpha is the common [...]
descendants [...]." Hm.
> Hou (1997) merely says "metatarsal V has been lost" for
> Jibeinia.
I've coded it as absent in *J.* and many others that were found
articulated in slabs, but I also made it irreversible.
> "The convex coracoidal cotyla in the scapula and concave scapular cotyla
> in the coracoid unite Ambiortus and Otogornis with the Ornithurae."
Wonderful.
BTW... remember when I promised some characters to unite Archie with
*Rahonavis* + *Shenzhouraptor* to the exclusion of everything else? Last
night I let the analysis run; I stopped it after 1195831 MPTs (length =
183); a few entries in the matrix were missing, so I don't have terribly
much confidence in the results, plus there were some stupid settings that
e. g. made the trees rooted on *Alexornis* (incredible!!!); 47 taxa, 62
characters (yay); the strict consensus is a green pasture; the 50 %
majority-rule consensus, shown as rooted on the allzero outgroup again
(which looks AFAIK identical to, say, *Compsognathus* or
*Sinosauropteryx*), is as follows...
+--allzero outgroup
`--+--*Caudipteryx* (all species lumped)
`--+--*Archaeopteryx* (both species lumped)
`--+--basal Troodontidae (*Sinovenator* + *-ornithoides* lumped)
`--+--*Microraptor* (both species lumped)
`--+--Scansoriopterygidae (both species lumped)
`--+--+--*Rahonavis*
| `--*Shenzhouraptor*
`--+--*Hulsanpes*
`--+--*Yandangornis*
`--+--*Sapeornis*
`--+--*Confuciusornis sanctus*
`--+--*Vorona*
`--+--*Patagopteryx*
`--+--Euornithes (see below)
`--Enantiornithes (see below)
Euornithes
|--*Yanornis*
`--+--*Yixianornis*
`--+--+--*Apsaravis*
| `--*Songlingornis*
`--+--+--*Lectavis* (I hate it)
| `--*Liaoningornis* (grrr)
`--+--*Anas* (with a bit too many question marks)
`--+--*Ichthyornis*
`--+--*Gansus*
`--+--*Hesperornis* (a few characters from *Baptornis*)
`--*Ambiortus*
Enantiornithes
|--*Gobipteryx* (and that's NOT because of its missing teeth... ~:-| )
`--+--*Iberomesornis*
`--+--*Noguerornis*
`--+--*Boluochia*
`--+--+--*Protopteryx*
| `--*Longipteryx*
`--+--*Jibeinia*
|--*Eocathayornis*
|--*Eoenantiornis*
|--*Alexornis*
`--+--*Otogornis*
|--*Yungavolucris*
`--+--*Sinornis*
`--+--unnamed from Lebanon
`--+--*Halimornis*
`--+--*Concornis*
`--+--+--*Avisaurus*
| `--*Soroavisaurus*
`--+--*Enantiornis*
`--+--*Eoalulavis*
`--+--*Cuspirostrisornis*
`--*Neuquenornis*
For your amusement. :-)
Most clades are discovered surprisingly often. Weakest support is around
both sides of the polytomy in Enantiornithes. Even the position of
*Hulsanpes* is remarkably constant. I'll certainly run an analysis without
the most fragmentary taxa, too, but much of the above looks like it's here
to stay when I include all taxa.
Does someone know what an *Ichthyornis* pelvis looks like in dorsal view?
Are the ilia sigmoid, like in Neornithes and *Avimimus*, or rather
straight and far apart, like in dromies, Archie and, as I saw yesterday,
*Longipteryx*?
--
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!