Re: Coelurosaur phylogeny

["T. Michael Keesey" <mightyodinn@yahoo.com>]

--- "Jaime A. Headden" <qilongia@yahoo.com> wrote:
>   Both "Dromavialae" and "Enigmosauria" are not even nomina nuda, they are
> simply useless, inapplicable names. Get them with a published definition,
> and this may change.

Publish definitions for them and they are no longer nomina nuda. Nomina nuda is
what they are *now*, IMHO. They are published names with indicated content, but
no formal declaration or definition. How is that different from a generic or
specific nomen nudum?

=====
=====> T. Michael Keesey <keesey@bigfoot.com>
=====> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
=====> BloodySteak <http://bloodysteak.com>
=====> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
=====

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com