Re: Many new references

[Dinogeorge@aol.com]

In a message dated 5/5/03 4:55:38 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
m.moser@lrz.uni-muenchen.de writes:

<< The reverse is the case: Dromaeosauroides bornholmensis is formally
 described in Christiansen & Bonde (2003: N. Jb.) and some information is
 repeated in Bonde & Christiansen (2003: C. R. Palevol), where the
 authors deliberately write "Dromaeosauroides bornholmensis Christiansen
 & Bonde 2003". >>

I have both papers and I note that although the actual description omits the 
holotype tooth specimen number (not yet catalogued), the second paper 
provides it.