Re: Coelurosaur Phylogeny

["T. Michael Keesey" <mightyodinn@yahoo.com>]

--- Nick Gardner <ratites637@hotmail.com> wrote:
> TMK wrote:
> >_Deltadromeus_ actually turns out to be ceratosaurian(!)
> 
> Reference? I thought this was debunked onlist.

Carrano et al. 2002 -- sorry, don't have the full ref on me.
Some archive links:
http://www.cmnh.org/dinoarch/2003Feb/msg00277.html (mention of Carrano)
http://www.cmnh.org/dinoarch/2002Oct/msg00326.html (Sereno's SVP talk)
http://www.cmnh.org/dinoarch/2001Jul/msg00158.html (mention of Rauhut)

Don't see any debunking but I may have missed it.

> Please use Segnosauria as opposed to Therizinosauria.

This *was* debunked onlist.
If you're using phylogenetic taxonomy, then you should use _Therizinosauria_,
since Segnosauria has never been explicitly defined. Synonymy cannot be shown.
If PhyloCode overturns this, fine. Until then....

=====
=====> T. Michael Keesey <keesey@bigfoot.com>
=====> The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
=====> BloodySteak <http://bloodysteak.com>
=====> Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
=====

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com