[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Undefined names, Caudipteryx

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Undefined names, Caudipteryx
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 19:26:12 +0200 (MEST)
References: <Law10-F26xjaUcP74pd0002391e@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

> As far as I know, there's no need for either of them, since 
> "Caudipterygidae"/"Caudipteriidae" would have the same content as 
> Caudipteryx. 
 
Caudipteridae (that's the spelling) could include *Nomingia*. -- And under 
Linnaean taxonomy there _is_ a need for that name, because every genus 
must belong to a family. One more thing I dislike about it. :-) 

-- 
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more  http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!

References:
- Re: Undefined names, Caudipteryx
  - From: "Brad McFeeters" <archosauromorph2@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Defending grades (Was: Re: Archaeopteryx (rant))
Next by Date: Re: Defending grades (Was: Re: Archaeopteryx (rant))
Previous by thread: Re: Undefined names, Caudipteryx
Next by thread: Re: Undefined names, Caudipteryx
Indexes: