[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dinosaur Planet

To: jrccea@bellsouth.net
Subject: Re: Dinosaur Planet
From: Nick Pharris <npharris@umich.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:30:58 -0500
Cc: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>, dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <3FDDEC25.C45D2E57@bellsouth.net>
References: <NDBBIAJHGJBHMGNKDFAHOEECGGAA.tholtz@geol.umd.edu> <3FDDEC25.C45D2E57@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: npharris@umich.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Quoting "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>:

> I forgot to look and see if the eyes were in the right
> place (most quetz illustrations place them too high), and didn't look to
> see if they retained the incorrect 'chisel point' beak from some of the
> illustrations.

No, they didn't have chisel-beaks.  They just looked like mutant *Pteranodon
sternbergi*.

Nick Pharris
Department of Linguistics
University of Michigan

References:
- RE: Dinosaur Planet
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>
- Re: Dinosaur Planet
  - From: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>

Prev by Date: Re: "Largest" dinosaurs...
Next by Date: RE: Dinosaur Planet
Previous by thread: Re: Dinosaur Planet
Next by thread: RE: Dinosaur Planet
Indexes: