[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Oldest Known Male Fossil: 425 MYA

To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Oldest Known Male Fossil: 425 MYA
From: "Mickey Mortimer" <Mickey_Mortimer111@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 14:21:04 -0800
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10312041357340.16095-100000@asuwlink.uwyo.edu> <3FCFCB5B.B5CF8111@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: Mickey_Mortimer111@msn.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

James Cunningham wrote-

> And won't be done again for that particular specimen, because it has
> been destroyed.  I hope they don't have a hard-drive failure.

Isn't anyone ever concerned that specimens examined in such ways could be
known in even more detail through advances in scanning technology in the
future?  It's like taking a photo, then throwing away the fossil.

Mickey Mortimer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oldest Known Male Fossil: 425 MYA
  - From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>

References:
- Oldest Known Male Fossil: 425 MYA
  - From: "Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu>
- Re: Oldest Known Male Fossil: 425 MYA
  - From: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Oldest Known Male Fossil: 425 MYA
Next by Date: Re: Oldest Known Male Fossil: 425 MYA
Previous by thread: RE: Oldest Known Male Fossil: 425 MYA
Next by thread: Re: Oldest Known Male Fossil: 425 MYA
Indexes: