This is also interesting because Caranno et
al. (2002) (tentatively) synonymized Lametasaurus, Indosaurus and
Indosuchus. Would be interesting to know just how many Lameta
abelisaurids there were.
Don't forget (and I'm sure you haven't) that a lot of the smaller theropods
described from the Lameta Beds might also have abelisaur affinities:
_Laevisuchus_, _Compsosuchus_, _Jubbulpuria_, _Coeluroides_ etc. Huene went
crazy naming theropods from India, and most of them are based on very
fragmentary material. Thus, many (most?) are probably _nomina dubia_. As
Jaime alluded to, paleontologists are going to have a fun, fun time sorting
out which Lameta taxa are valid, and which are crap.
BTW, isn't the type material of _Lametasaurus indicus_ a composite of
different taxa?