[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: SUCHOMIMUS = BARYONYX

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: SUCHOMIMUS = BARYONYX
From: padron@stud.ntnu.no
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:17:10 +0200
In-reply-to: <3DAD291D.30367.428834@localhost>
References: <3DAD291D.30367.428834@localhost>
Reply-to: padron@stud.ntnu.no
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Sitat darren.naish@port.ac.uk:

> George wrote...
> 
> > The current issue of JVP features the new combination     
> > Baryonyx tenerensis. You can make of that what you will.

Heh
I smell scandal:)

What happens when/if Suchomiums finally sinks into B. tenerensis?
Some, more than others, seem to emotionally kling to generic names, and 
break down in tears when a name is decleared "invalid", 
remember Syntarsus? :)

--------Øyvind M. Padron--------
--------------------------------
http://the_dinosauria.tripod.com
--------------------------------

References:
- SUCHOMIMUS = BARYONYX
  - From: darren.naish@port.ac.uk

Prev by Date: Re: -oidea in Genus Names
Next by Date: G. Causey Whittow
Previous by thread: SUCHOMIMUS = BARYONYX
Next by thread: Re: Egyptian Expeditions
Indexes: