[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Flight of the Dodo (and solitaire)

To: "Dinonet \(E-mail\)" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: RE: Flight of the Dodo (and solitaire)
From: "Tracy L. Ford" <dino.hunter@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:10:31 -0800
In-reply-to: <FDF9D18514DEDF4A9746F1ADC56B248B36D14C@agronmail.agron.iastate.edu>
Reply-to: dino.hunter@cox.net
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]On Behalf Of
Williams, Tim
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 10:14 AM
To: 'dinosaur@usc.edu'
Subject: RE: Flight of the Dodo (and solitaire)

Jeff Hecht wrote:

> >Shapiro et al. (2002).  Flight of the Dodo.  Nature 295: 1683.
>
> It's actually Science, not Nature, as noted above

D'oh!  Still waiting for that caffeine to filter through to my brain...
Yep, it's in _Science_, not _Nature_.<<

Shouldn't that read D'oh D'oh?

Tracy L. Ford
P. O. Box 1171
Poway Ca  92074

References:
- RE: Flight of the Dodo (and solitaire)
  - From: "Williams, Tim" <TiJaWi@agron.iastate.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Combined answer Archaeopteryx running...
Next by Date: RE: Combined answer Archaeopteryx running...
Previous by thread: RE: Flight of the Dodo (and solitaire)
Next by thread: Re: Flight of the Dodo (and solitaire)
Indexes: