From: "Bruce E Shillinglaw" <SHILLINGLAWB@prodigy.net>
Reply-To: SHILLINGLAWB@prodigy.net
To: "Dinosaur Mailing List" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: New Tyrannosaurus paper
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 19:17:34 -0500
Hi, All!
This talk of horses, tyrannosaurs and running brings a question into
my
mind. For a long while, people have talked about research (I can't recall
_whose_, and don't have the paper - I don't have very much in the way of
primary literature in my personal library, yet another thing I'd like to do
something about one of these days) which showed that *Tyrannosaurus* would
suffer fatal damage if it fell while running, and suggested that it would
therefore be maladaptive for *Tyrannosaurus* to _run_. (muscle mass
notwithstanding)
Horses _also_ frequently suffer fatal damage if they fall while
running,
as far too many thorobred owners and jockeys have discovered. And yet
horses
still run! In fact, they're _specialized_ for it. Giraffes, as someone
mentioned yesterday, also gallop at great speed, and if one ever fell, from
_that_ height, getting up and walking away would be unlikely, to say the
least.
Thus my question - why would the likelihood of serious damage be any
more limiting to mega-theropods than it is to large, fast ungulates?
Bruce