[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: No Cretaceous rainforests?

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: No Cretaceous rainforests?
From: Danvarner@aol.com
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 11:06:13 EDT
Reply-to: Danvarner@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

In a message dated 6/29/02 6:41:58 AM Eastern Daylight Time, StephanPickering@cs.com writes:

<< To infer, as the new paper does, that rainforests did not exist is ludicrous. >>

If I'm not mistaken, the new paper is referring to angiosperm rainforests. I'd hesitate to characterize Kirk Johnson's conclusions as "ludicrous". DV

Prev by Date: Paper on Chinese sauropods
Next by Date: John Dickenson
Previous by thread: No Cretaceous rainforests?
Next by thread: "Sound of Thunder" Movie News
Indexes: