Re: Storrs Olson and Archaeoraptor

[Dinogeorge@aol.com]

In a message dated 6/6/02 5:13:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
qilongia@yahoo.com writes:

<< There is no real name to supress. I would propose a simple letter to
 Nature or Science or other journal that would clearly be able to delineate
 the nature of the issue. As I see it, Archaeoraptor was never established
 as a valid name, and is only a nomen nudum and thus would not need to be
 suppressed. Perhaps I still have it wrong, though, >>

The problem is that there are too many arguments pro and con that are not 
easily resolved to everyone's satisfaction. Some say this, some say that. An 
explicit ruling of suppression would close the case.