Re: African neognaths

["Brian Lauret" <zthemanvirus@hotmail.com>]

> From: "Fred Ruhe" <fredruhe@xs4all.nl>
> Reply-To: fredruhe@xs4all.nl
> To: "DML" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
> Subject: Re: African neognaths
> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 18:28:36 +0200
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Lauret" <zthemanvirus@hotmail.com>
> To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 8:34 PM
> Subject: African neognaths
>
>
> > The African neognaths
> >
> > With all the recent studies regarding the placental radiation,and the
> > subsequent "discovery" of Afrotheria,one might wonder if the same holds
> true
> > for Tertiary neognaths.I've been examining evidence for neognaths
> evolution
> > en geographic origin,based on fossil evidence and DNA-studies to look
> wether
> > there are groups wich might have been ancestrally African.All in all I
> came
> > to this conclusion,and I would like to know what certain people on the
> list
> > think about it.A reply would thus be nice.
> >
> > I found these groups to be ancestrally African:
> >
> ....................
> > Cathartids seem to be their closest relatives but first appear in Eocene
> > Europe,................
>
> Mlikovsky 2002 removed all Cathartids from Europe's list:
>
> http://web.redbox.cz/mlikovsky/Cenozoic-birds-of-Europe.pdf
>
>
> Fred Ruhe

Thanks for informing me about this error in my study.
En bij de weg,ik ben ook Nederlands.(for non-Dutch readers of 
this,interested in what's said here,it's "By the way,I'm Dutch as well.)



_________________________________________________________________
Chat on line met vrienden en probeer MSN Messenger uit: 
http://messenger.msn.nl