[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Caenagnathiformes (toothlessness)
In a message dated Wed, 30 Jan 2002 2:23:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, "Michael
de Sosa" <ofsosa@uclink4.berkeley.edu> writes:
> "Recent jawless one". Riiiight... or maybe, he was trying to compare it to
> Recent hagfish* and lampreys ("Agnatha"). After all, Iguanodon is named
> after iguanas, Cetiosaurus is named after whales... That makes just as much
> sense as inventing the name "recent jawless one" for an isolated jaw. Then
> again, we have the whole Altispinax-named-after-a-tooth thing.
>
> Regardless of what the literal Latin translation might yield, Sternberg's
> meaning is clear from his paper (in which he did not see fit to provide an
> etymology). He considered his Caenagnathus to be a bird more advanced than
> Hesperornis and Icthyornis... closer to "recent birds". It's not a misnomer
> like I previously said. Not quite, anyway.
>
> This just in, I've decided that Carnotaurus actually means "fleshy southern
> tailless one".
>
> carn- 'flesh'
> not- 'southern' (combined with the previous word to avoid duplication of the
> 'n')
Ah, interesting. This is called "haplophony", and it does happen from time to
time...
> a- 'not', 'without'
> -uros = 'tail'
Nope, that'd be "carnonotanurus":
carn- 'flesh'
-o- connector
not- 'southern'
an- 'not', 'without' (allomorph used before vowels)
ur- 'tail'
-os masc./fem. of compound adjectives
:-)
--Nick P.