[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Opisthocoelicaudia (was Re: Titanosaurids)

To: "The Dinosaur Mailing List" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Opisthocoelicaudia (was Re: Titanosaurids)
From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:22:15 +0100
References: <FDF9D18514DEDF4A9746F1ADC56B248B36D035@agronmail.agron.iastate.edu> <00ed01c1a48e$50e6d160$fe000f3f@hppav>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mickey_Mortimer11" <Mickey_Mortimer11@email.msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:19 AM


> Just picture all the characters in my coelurosaur study- cervical 1
without
> pleurocoels...... dorsal 9 with two pleurocoels....... caudal 34 without
> transverse processes.  Ahhhhh!

Actually, it would work if everyone had the same number of vertebrae. But
who says the 20th caudal of *Diplodocus* is homologous to the 20th caudal of
*Brachiosaurus*?

Sorry for my previous post which was intended for the PhyloCode mailing
list. I've practically automated to change the To: line from the original
sender to this list. ~:-(

References:
- RE: Opisthocoelicaudia (was Re: Titanosaurids)
  - From: "Williams, Tim" <TiJaWi@agron.iastate.edu>
- Re: Opisthocoelicaudia (was Re: Titanosaurids)
  - From: "Mickey_Mortimer11" <Mickey_Mortimer11@email.msn.com>

Prev by Date: Re: remaining jobs... (Trivial)
Next by Date: Re: Class AVES expanded (preliminary classification)
Previous by thread: CRETACEOUS BRACHIOSAURS
Next by thread: RE: Opisthocoelicaudia (was Re: Titanosaurids)
Indexes: