Re: The problem of informal names (was RE: "Ichabodcraniosaurus")

[Dinogeorge@aol.com]

In a message dated 1/17/02 1:29:18 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
david.marjanovic@gmx.at writes:

<< It's less serious -- and much less probable to become a valid name -- than
 *"Zupaysaurus"*, which you don't list because it AFAIK hasn't appeared on
 paper so far, only online and on TV. >>

Yes indeed. But "Ichabodcraniosaurus" has appeared on paper in a popular 
dinosaur book. I can imagine someone somewhere emailing me with the question, 
"How come 'Ichabodcraniosaurus' isn't in your supposedly complete list of 
published dinosaur names?"