[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: The problem of informal names (was RE: "Ichabodcraniosaurus")

To: "The Dinosaur Mailing List" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: The problem of informal names (was RE: "Ichabodcraniosaurus")
From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 22:27:00 +0100
References: <15b.778f002.2978970a@aol.com>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

> Don't be so sure about this--I'm a pretty anal completist in this respect.

It's less serious -- and much less probable to become a valid name -- than
*"Zupaysaurus"*, which you don't list because it AFAIK hasn't appeared on
paper so far, only online and on TV.

And psychoanalysis is regularly used as an example of pseudoscience by
science theorists :-)

References:
- Re: The problem of informal names (was RE: "Ichabodcraniosaurus")
  - From: Dinogeorge@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: The problem of informal names (was RE: "Ichabodcraniosaurus")
Next by Date: Re: Sauropods in wet versus dry environments... a tip of the hatto some past ...
Previous by thread: Re: The problem of informal names (was RE: "Ichabodcraniosaurus")
Next by thread: Re: The problem of informal names (was RE: "Ichabodcraniosaurus")
Indexes: