[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Regarding Spinosaurus
>> how many big-bodied, freshwater, warm-blooded,
>> obligate fisheaters does anyone know of?
>It is certainly possible for a large, warm-blooded, terrestrial predator to
>support itself on fish, at least for a while, if there are enough fish
>around. Many brown bears all around the north Pacific get most (perhaps
>sometimes all?) of their food intake in the form of salmon during the salmon
>runs.
Several responses illustrate the interesting difficulties here. In groping for
a big-bodied, warm-blooded, freshwater, obligate fish-eater, the first thought
is to turn to the sea for analogues. But oceans and freshwater environments are
very different places, particularly in terms of connectivity and continuity of
food supply over ecological and evoultionary timescales. Ditto the point about
brown bears - during the salmon run, fine, but what about at other times? Are
freshwaters stable and/or interconnected enough over suitable timescales to
allow the evolution of big-bodied, warm-blooded, gas-guzzling,
starve-in-a-month-if-things-go-belly-up, obligate fish-eaters? (I take the
point about 'obligate' being extreme - useful for speculation though!)
Best to all
Chris