[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
ARGH!! SAUROPOD NECKS
Hi Matt, many thanks for your response. BTW, didn't know that you
were in phd land. Belated congrats!!
You wrote...
> I don't think Stevens or Parrish say that the necks are inflexible.
Well, ok: but I said 'relatively' inflexible. While they don't state it, I
think they posit less flexibility in diplodocoid necks than people had
imagined before, though seeing as no one had explicitly depicted what
sort of flexibility they imagined, this is arguable. OTOH, there are
Uncle Bob drawings of _Diplodocus_ sweeping its neck far far to the
side (frontispiece or similar in _Dinosaur Heresies_).
> Criticisms about the neck position seem to stem from the idea that in
> mammals the discs between the vertebrae can be thick and can add to
> the flexibility of the neck. [snip]
> So far as I know, disarticulation of zygapophyses does
> not occur even in camels and okapis.
I think this idea stems from comments Jeff Wilson made during an
SVP presentation. He showed a dromedary looping its neck over on
itself and said that it was pretty much impossible to get a naked
skeleton to do it. However, IIRC the direct criticisms that have been
leveled at the Stevens-Parrish study don't concern comparison with the
different verts of mammals, but with the accuracy of the data they used
in their reconstructions (Upchurch in _Science_). I also recall Paul
Upchurch mentioning that flexibility in the cranial dorsals would also
have an effect on neck flexibility, though I cannot remember if he
stated this in his _Science_ response.
> "-- Those who work on tooth microwear seem pretty confident that
> diplodocoids were not feeding at ground level."
>
> This comment stems from the idea that only conifers and other woody
> plants could cause dental microwear. However, horsetails, which
> contain silica, were abundant during the Jurassic..... [snip]
The comment about microwear is a reference to diplodocoid enamel
lacking the pits caused by grit ingested when feeding near the ground,
not an implication that the teeth lack tooth-food microwear (whether
caused by conifers, horsetails or whatever). At least that's my
interpretation after reading Fiorillo and Barrett and Upchurch, and
talking about it with Barrett. What effect food choice has on
microwear is a complex area though (cf. Solounias and Janis!) and I
suppose it's probably not that simple, unfortunately:)
Gotta go catch a ferry. Later.
DARREN NAISH
PALAEOBIOLOGY RESEARCH GROUP
School of Earth & Environmental Sciences
UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH
Burnaby Building
Burnaby Road email: darren.naish@port.ac.uk
Portsmouth UK tel (mobile): 0776 1372651
P01 3QL tel (office): 023 92842244
www.palaeobiology.co.uk