[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
SAUROPOD NECKS & "VICTORIAN" ILLUSTRATIONS
Having just waded through god knows how many dinosaur-related
emails, I've been interested to follow the discussions about sauropod
necks and feeding style. Some thoughts, or, a European perspective...
-- The 'European school of beam-like necks' (yours truly a former
member) - relying mostly on ideas about cervical rib mobility - has
been effectively refuted by Matt Wedel et al in their work on
_Sauroposeidon_.
-- The models of Kent Stevens et al are therefore the best argument for
the presence of relatively inflexible necks. However, these have been
criticised by those who know sauropod morphology very very well and
the only published results thus far concern diplodocoids, a group
already thought by most to be horizontal-necked.
-- Those who work on tooth microwear seem pretty confident that
diplodocoids were not feeding at ground level.
On the subject of the accuracy of old illustrations, Jaime wrote...
> These are carbon-dust illustrations, and I would agree that the
> artist who performed them, as was popular at the time, was in excellent shape
> to follow the specimens exactly. For instance, look at work in the
> monographs popular in England and elsewhere in Europe in the late
> 1800's where the illustrations are almost better than bone.
Though some Victorian-era and younger illustrations might be
tremendously accurate, others are certainly not, and indeed some are
downright misleading. Of incidental note here is that BMNH R1828
[_Becklespinax_/_Altispinax_] differs in various minor ways from the
fold-out plate in Owen (1858). Of relevance to Jaime's contention is
stuff I learnt from Kent Stevens regarding the figures of
_Brachiosaurus_ in Janensch's papers: Kent relied on these diagrams
for his reconstruction of the brachiosaur neck (presented at SVPCA
Edinburgh, 1999), but only after comparing their measurements with
those of the Berlin mount. Apparently the diagrams are super-accurate
down to the mm.
And I like to think it was thanks to me that Kent came up with the idea
of dissecting camels and okapis:) (He did not see Jeff Wilson's talk at
SVP Denver). Shame about the horizontal-necked macronarians
though...:)
DARREN NAISH
PALAEOBIOLOGY RESEARCH GROUP
School of Earth & Environmental Sciences
UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH
Burnaby Building
Burnaby Road email: darren.naish@port.ac.uk
Portsmouth UK tel (mobile): 0776 1372651
P01 3QL tel (office): 023 92842244
www.palaeobiology.co.uk