[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Regarding Spinosaurus
Aspidel wrote:
>I'd better imagine this fat storage for LTr _Coelophysis_ or deep south
>taxa like _Cryolophosaurus_.
Where do camels live today? Is it mere coincidence that the camel currently
lives in the same part of the world once occupied by tall-spined spinosaurs,
ouranosaurs and sauropods? To be honest, I don't know - but it's worth
thinking about.
Anyway, if (and I stress *if*) spinosaurids were scavengers, then it might
make sense to store as much fat as possible. Many vultures are
gobble-and-go scavengers - they sometimes eat so much that they can't take
off, and have a capacious crop to store the food. This is because
scavengers have to rely on something else doing their killing for them -
predators, disease, old age - and so they have to make the best of a very
unpredictable food source. Since the preferred choice of food of scavengers
is carrion, it may be a long wait between meals. When times are good for
everyone else, they're bad for scavengers - at least those who lack the
equipment or impulse to attack live prey.
Having said that, I think spinosaurs had thermoregulatory sails, not adipose
humps. As for _Acrocanthosaurus_ (maybe), _Metriacanthosaurus_, and
_Altispinax_ (which is apparently the correct genus name after all), I
prefer to restore them with humps.
Tim